A Baekje Rafter Tile: Read the Lotus and the Wooden Roof Edge Together
A lotus on a Korean roof tile is part of an architectural object. In the National Museum of Korea's Baekje record Jeung1754, the tile is identified with a rafter end and a protective function, as well as decoration.
Start with the round face, then ask what wooden part of a building it belonged with. This gives a small museum object a practical setting without inventing the full appearance of its original roof.
1. Give the flower a careful first look
The museum calls the object Roof-end Tiles with Lotus Design and identifies its period as the Baekje Kingdom. Its material entry is clay, and the listed diameter is17.0cm. Keep these record details together rather than using an image alone to assign a date or a production place.
In your first note, describe what the lotus looks like at the scale available to you. Where is the center? How are the surrounding forms arranged? If a detail cannot be seen clearly, leave a question instead of completing the design from memory. The cover here is an explanatory concept, so use the linked museum record for the accessioned object's details.
2. Connect the face to a rafter
The record categorizes the piece as a rafter roof tile. Its explanation connects this kind of decorative tile with protecting wooden rafters against decay. A note about a flower alone would miss that relation to a building.
| Part of the note | What belongs there |
|---|---|
| Record | Baekje; diameter17.0cm; Jeung1754 |
| Function described by the museum | Protection of wooden rafters, with decoration |
| Question to keep open | How did this particular piece fit its original setting? |
This is a reading aid, not a construction diagram. The short record does not supply everything needed to reconstruct a complete ancient roof.
3. Try a scale and function exercise
Draw a circle17cm across on paper, using a ruler. This is a way to think about the stated diameter; it does not reproduce the object's thickness, weight or carved details. Put your circle beside a one-line note naming its architectural role.
Then write two separate sentences: one describing the lotus, and one explaining the function given in the record. If you want to compare another tile, begin again with that object's museum number and dimensions. A shared flower motif alone is not enough to make two tiles the same type or date.
For a future museum visit, check current display information separately. An online collection record is useful for study even when it does not tell you which gallery you can enter today.
Can the lotus design identify every Korean tile as Baekje?
No. The period here comes from this object's museum record. A motif by itself is not a complete attribution method.
Read the National Museum of Korea object record
Checked October21,2026. National Museum of Korea, Roof-end Tiles with Lotus Design, Jeung1754. The entry is in English within Chinese navigation. Observation tasks are original.
The cover is an AI-generated architectural concept illustration; the reading diagram was created separately. Neither image is a photograph of accessionJeung1754.
댓글
댓글 쓰기